Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 678/2015

Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., and Indus Towers Ltd. regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-06-29
Duration
2 years, 4 months, 16 days
Case Closed
Thu, 06/29/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Shanavas filed for restoration of a petition against Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. and Indus Towers Ltd. on medical grounds, without producing sufficient documents. The court allowed the restoration with a cost of Rs.2500 imposed on the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration of the petition filed by Shanavas against Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., on medical grounds, despite insufficient documentation, with a cost of Rs.2500 imposed on the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition restoration with cost of Rs.2500
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration of the petition filed by Shanavas against Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., on medical grounds, despite insufficient documentation, with a cost of Rs.2500 imposed on the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

IA 678/15 allowed. This IA is restored. The reason stated in the petition is not sufficient reason for restoration of this IA. The petition is filed on medical ground. But no documents are produced to substantiate the claim. But in order to provide an opportunity and to avoid unnecessary further litigation. I am inclient to allow this petition on costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. IA allowed

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shanavas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
General Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Documents supporting the medical grounds not provided
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate representing Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd.
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Petition restoration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition with a cost of Rs.2500 imposed on the petitioner
Evidence:
IA 678/15 allowed. This IA is restored. The reason stated in the petition is not sufficient reason for restoration of this IA. The petition is filed on medical ground. But no documents are produced to substantiate the claim. But in order to provide an opportunity and to avoid unnecessary further litigation. I am inclient to allow this petition on costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. IA allowed

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., and Indus Towers Ltd. regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., and Indus Towers Ltd. regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 03/03/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/29/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won