Case Summary
Yusaf Sakhafi filed a restoration petition seeking relief. The respondent, Alavi Haji, contested the petition. The court allowed the petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Relief allowed on payment of costs
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition on payment of costs of ₹2500.
Key Reasoning:
No documents produced, respondent did not show sufficient reason. Court inclined to allow petition for relief after providing another chance on payment of costs.
No documents produced, respondent did not show sufficient reason. Court inclined to allow petition for relief after providing another chance on payment of costs.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
No documents produced, respondent did not show sufficient reason. Court inclined to allow petition for relief after providing another chance on payment of costs.
No documents produced, respondent did not show sufficient reason. Court inclined to allow petition for relief after providing another chance on payment of costs.
Supporting Evidence
Since for providing oner more chance for giving a relief. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition stands allowed on payment of costs of ₹2500. make the payment on or before.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Yusaf Sakhafi
- Party Age
- 41
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alavi Haji
- Party Age
- 69
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed on payment of costs
Evidence:
The court allowed the petition on payment of costs of ₹2500.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2017