| Niyamam AI

Displaying 141 - 145 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 436 of 2022

Ernakulam District

2024-02-21

approximately-1 year 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Royal John vs Joseph Xavier regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 525/2023

Ernakulam

2024-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vimal Arackal, Bindhu Vimal vs Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1241/2018

Ernakulam

2025-10-30

approximately-7 years 15 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shivan M.V vs M. V Sarojini regarding injunction.

Injunction

O.S. No. 64/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 563/2025

Ernakulam District, Kerala State

2025-09-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

48%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Multiple cases dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during critical court proceedings.

Found in 48 cases (48%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Cases Due to No Representation

Several suits dismissed for lack of representation by the plaintiffs or their legal counsel.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Not Pressed by Plaintiff's Counsel

Cases dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel did not press the suit forward in court.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Cases Due to No Representation

Not Pressed by Plaintiff's Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?