Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 525/2023

Case between Royal John vs Joseph Xavier regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Royal John, has filed a suit against the defendant, Joseph Xavier, for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction of his right of way to his property. The defendant allegedly threatened to obstruct the plaintiff's access to his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to refrain from obstructing the plaintiff's property access.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff's right of way.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to refrain from obstructing the plaintiff's property access.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents admitted into evidence satisfactorily established the plaintiff's claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents admitted into evidence satisfactorily established the plaintiff's claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, a) The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agent from causing any manner of hindrance or obstruction to the plaintiff's right of way through the C schedule property for having ingress and egress to A schedule property from the public road...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Royal John
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Xavier @ Jsohy
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sale deed no 2578/1985, Original Sale deed 1717/2023, The Original Thandaper Account issued by Elamkulam Village Office, True copy of tax receipt by Elamkulam village office, Original Special Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peeyus A Kottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's right of way.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agent from causing any manner of hindrance or obstruction to the plaintiff's right of way through the C schedule property for having ingress and egress to A schedule property from the public road.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from causing nuisance.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, from putting any waste or garbage into the plaint A schedule property or causing any manner of nuisance to the peaceful life of the plaintiff and his age old parents living therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the plaintiff's right of way purchase.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding property records.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the tax records relevant to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Special Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorizes a representative to act on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Royal John vs Joseph Xavier regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Royal John vs Joseph Xavier regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nicolas P Dias et al vs M.K.Aboobacker et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Karthika Pradeep vs Sulthana Habeeb et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won