| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 111 - 115 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Smt. M. Indiramma vs Sunitha Markose regarding possession of a building

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 47/2019

Ernakulam

2024-05-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sunil J Chungath vs Baiju Y.P. regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 14/2020

Ernakulam

2024-04-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Basheer T.A. vs Abdul Salam M.C regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 83/2023

Ernakulam

2024-04-08

approximately-1 year 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sara Abdul Kalam vs M/s. RKN Automotive regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 173/2022

Ernakulam

2024-04-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mariamma Oommen vs Muhammad Asker regarding withdrawal of rent control petition.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 91/2023

Ernakulam

2024-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Inadequate Representation or Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to absence or lack of representation during hearings, leading to automatic dismissals.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Petitions Not Pressed

Multiple cases were dismissed as petitioners or their counsel opted not to press their petitions.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Establish Claims

Plaintiffs often failed to prove their case or establish necessary legal grounds, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Improper Documentation or Fees

Court dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not adhering to proper documentation or fee requirements.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Inadequate Representation or Absence

Petitions Not Pressed

Failure to Establish Claims

Improper Documentation or Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?