Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.58/2023

Case between P.P.Andru et al vs Olakkotte Prsanthan regarding eviction under rent control laws

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.P.Andru and P.P.Jaseela, the petitioners, are seeking eviction of the respondent Olakkotte Prsanthan from the premises they own. The petitioners claim they need the premises for a new business venture.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction against the respondent and granted the petitioners possession of the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent and possession of the premises granted to the petitioners.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction against the respondent and granted the petitioners possession of the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The need for the premises for a new business was established as bona fide by the petitioners.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The need for the premises for a new business was established as bona fide by the petitioners.
Supporting Evidence
The first petitioner has categorically and specifically asserted his bonafide need and the circumstances that led to the filing of the rent control petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.P.Andru
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.P.Jaseela
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Olakkotte Prsanthan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 03.04.2023, Reply notice dated 16.04.2023.
Defendants Documents
Income Tax Returns and certificates related to business activities.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Mayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Henna.K.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The rent control petition is allowed under section 11 (3), of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the proceedings to be paid to the petitioner.
Evidence:
I find no reason to deviate from the normal rule. The point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice calling upon the respondent to vacate the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the respondent's counsel to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Income tax return
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proof of income for the assessment years 2019-2020 to 2024-2025.
Reference:
Ext.B1 - Ext.B6
Document Type: Certificate from Star Health Insurance
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certification of the respondent's affiliation with Star Health Insurance.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Award of Excellence Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Recognition received by the respondent from the Life Insurance Corporation.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Certificate of Membership
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Membership certifications from Life Insurance Corporation for specific years.
Reference:
Ext.B9 - Ext.B10

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.P.Andru et al vs Olakkotte Prsanthan regarding eviction under rent control laws
Case Code Year
Case between P.P.Andru et al vs Olakkotte Prsanthan regarding eviction under rent control laws

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won