Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Rent Control Petition. No. 20/2022

Case between Eledath Abdul Najeeb vs Vallikkatt Anand Kumar regarding Rent Control

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Eledath Abdul Najeeb filed a petition against Vallikkatt Anand Kumar for getting vacant possession of a shop room and for arrears of rent. The petitioner claims that the shop room is needed for his wife's food packing business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the shop room within one month. The petitioner was also granted the right to recover arrears of rent with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is entitled to the vacant possession of the shop room and costs of the proceedings.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the shop room within one month. The petitioner was also granted the right to recover arrears of rent with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner demonstrated bona fide need for the shop room for his wife's business.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner demonstrated bona fide need for the shop room for his wife's business.
Supporting Evidence
His evidence is unchallenged, I find no reason to discard his evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1.The petition is allowed u/s.11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act. 2.The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the room within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Eledath Abdul Najeeb
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vallikkatt Anand Kumar
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenmam Assignment Deed No. 2269/2018, Lease agreement, Lawyer Notice, Reply Notice, Registration Certificate from food safety authority.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Premdeep Mahesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to surrender vacant possession of the shop room within one month.
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the room within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the respondent to pay arrears of rent along with interest and costs.
Evidence:
If the respondents pays or proves to be paid rent at the rate of Rs.500/- from 01.06.2020 till 01.02.2022 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs of this proceedings within one month from today, Order u/s.11(2)(b) will be vacated.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Petitioner is entitled to get costs of this proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the agreement between the petitioner and the respondent regarding the lease of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent by the petitioner to the respondent regarding arrears of rent and seeking vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is the respondent's reply to the petitioner's lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed establishes the petitioner's ownership of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate is issued to the petitioner for the food safety authority, supporting the intended business activity.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another registration certificate to support the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document allows the petitioner to act on behalf of the power of attorney holder.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Eledath Abdul Najeeb vs Vallikkatt Anand Kumar regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Eledath Abdul Najeeb vs Vallikkatt Anand Kumar regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Fathimabi and Sakeena vs Haroon. R. Rasheed regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideenkutty Haji vs Chandran regarding eviction of shoproom
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Niyas vs Jamsheer.V regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Madhavan vs Binjusha regarding rent control matters.
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Sri.Mahamood Haji vs Sivarajan et al regarding eviction of tenants
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Rent Control Plaintiff Won