| Niyamam AI

Displaying 346 - 350 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muriattu Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. vs Pradeep Kumar regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 14/2021

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam

2025-12-01

approximately-4 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Genttleman Chit fund India Pvt Ltd vs Narayanankutty C.S regarding withdrawal of complaint under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

ST 114/2016

Vaikom Taluk

2025-07-07

approximately-11 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Kottayam District General Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd et al vs K.M.Rajeev regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 39/2023

Vaikom

2025-07-11

approximately-6 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mithra Bandhu Nidhi Ltd Company vs Sindhu G Nair regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 2/2022

Vaikom

2025-07-28

approximately-3 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kottayam District General Mraketing Co-operative Society Ltd.No K 1075 vs Rajeshkumar. G regarding Offence U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 4/2022

Vaikom

2025-06-12

approximately-3 years 2 months 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

55%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Most cases involved plaintiffs withdrawing their complaints, resulting in automatic acquittals for defendants.

Found in 55 cases (55%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate claims, leading to defendants' acquittals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs failing to appear, resulting in acquittals for the accused.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Legal Liability

Complaints were often dismissed as plaintiffs could not demonstrate the defendants' legal liability for the cheque dishonor.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Failure to Prove Legal Liability

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?