Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST 14/2021

Case between Muriattu Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. vs Pradeep Kumar regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Vaikom
Judge
Miss. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months
Case Code No.
14
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muriattu Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. is the complainant represented by its Managing Director Manoharan M.S. The case involves an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused, Pradeep Kumar, was acquitted due to the complainant's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was acquitted due to the absence of the complainant, which was deemed a clear disobedience of the court order.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted due to the absence of the complainant, which was deemed a clear disobedience of the court order.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence accused acquitted U/s. 256 Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muriattu Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep Kumar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. P.M Natesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Divya Natesan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. V. Manmohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted U/s. 256 Cr.PC due to the complainant's absence.
Evidence:
Accused present. Case is posted for evidence. Without the presence of the complainant, evidence cannot be taken. Hence accused acquitted U/s. 256 Cr.PC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Wed, 04/07/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Genttleman Chit fund India Pvt Ltd vs Narayanankutty C.S regarding withdrawal of complaint under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II,VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Gentleman Chit Funds Company (India) PVT Ltd. vs Abdul Shabeer K.A regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mithra Bandhu Nidhi Ltd Company vs Sindhu G Nair regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II,VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd. vs Haris regarding cheque dishonour.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Vaikom
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Gentleman Chits Funds Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Pratheesh Manoharan K. regarding Offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won