Case Summary
Mithra Bandhu Nidhi Ltd Company is the complainant against Sindhu G Nair for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was not represented during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant was not present, so the case could not proceed. The accused was acquitted as per Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Key Reasoning:
The case could not proceed due to the absence of the complainant.
The case could not proceed due to the absence of the complainant.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Without his presence complaint cannot be proceed with.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence accused acquitted U/s.256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mithra Bandhu Nidhi Ltd Company
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sindhu G Nair
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Joshi Cheepunkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. N. Harimohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted due to the complainant not being represented.
Evidence:
Hence accused acquitted U/s.256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2022
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act