Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST 10/2023

Case between Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd. vs Haris regarding cheque dishonour.

Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Vaikom
Judge
Miss. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Code No.
10
Case Closed
Mon, 09/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd. as the complainant against Haris, who was accused of dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the accused after determining that there was no legally enforceable debt.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was found not guilty of the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found not guilty of the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant failed to produce proper accounts of the accused before the court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and he is acquitted under Section 255 (1) of the CrPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haris
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No.784731 dated 14.02.2018 for Rs.99,640/-, Legal notice dated 07.03.2018, Postal receipt dated 07.03.2018.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.G. Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Harimohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused for payment of chit fund dues.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demand notice issued to the accused for the cheque amount.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt evidencing the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card confirming receipt of the legal notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Chit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the chit transactions between the complainant and accused.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt related to the payments made by the accused in the chit transactions.
Reference:
Ext.P9
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the management structure of the complainant company.
Reference:
Ext.P10

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Fri, 03/23/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Genttleman Chit fund India Pvt Ltd vs Narayanankutty C.S regarding withdrawal of complaint under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II,VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Gentleman Chits Funds Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Pratheesh Manoharan K. regarding Offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Shafana Nishad regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Sabitha regarding Section 138 of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits vs Shyla Saji regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won