| Niyamam AI

Displaying 291 - 295 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Subair. C. vs Sulaiman regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

ST.28/2015

Tirur

2015-09-18

Approximately 4 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jamsheer vs Sulaiman regarding dishonoured cheque under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - U/s 138 of N.I. Act

ST.29/ 2015

Tirur

2015-09-18

2 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ganesan vs Suresh Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

ST.100/2012

Tirur

2015-09-14

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jayakumar vs Abdul Azeez regarding dishonored cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

ST Case No.34 of 2015

Tirur, Malappuram District

2015-08-24

6 years 1 month 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sreenivasan vs Abdul Azeez regarding dishonored cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonor

ST Case No.38/2015

Tirur

2015-08-24

8 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently withdrew their complaints, leading to accused acquittals.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to sustain their claims, resulting in not guilty verdicts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

The absence of the complainant during court proceedings led to the dismissal or acquittal of cases.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

Lack of Legal Enforceability

Plaintiffs often could not prove a legally enforceable debt or obligation, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Legal Enforceability

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?