Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.100/2012

Case between Ganesan vs Suresh Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-09-14
Duration
4 years
Case Code No.
100
Case Closed
Mon, 09/14/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complainant alleged accused issued a cheque that bounced, leading to a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acquitted the accused as the complainant failed to prove that the accused had issued the cheque in question.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Guilty
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused as the complainant failed to prove that the accused had issued the cheque in question.
Key Reasoning:
Complainant failed to establish accused executed and issued the cheque in question
Why Defendant Won:
Complainant failed to establish accused executed and issued the cheque in question
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has failed to establish that the accused executed and issued Ext.P1 cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

Judgment Evidence:

The accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ganesan
Party Age
43
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
40
Relation
Son of
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque (Ext.P1), Memo, Intimation, Lawyer notice, Acknowledgment, Reply notice
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of OS.44/12, Various cheques, Extract of ledger, Forensic report

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Guilty
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Complainant failed to prove accused issued the cheque
Evidence:
The accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque (Ext.P1)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Dated:1.8.2010- Cheque No.510883 drawn on Bank of Baroda, Tirur Branch
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Forensic report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Report dated 10.12.2014 by Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Thrissur
Reference:
Ext.X10

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Burden of proof on complainant
Case Code
ST.
Case Code Year
2012

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 08/14/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/14/2015 - 12:00
From
Tue, 09/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Wed, 09/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohammed Abdulrahiman vs Mohammed Abdulla Kavungal regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Senior Secondary MES Central School vs K.P. Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Razikbabu vs Basheer Puthanveettil regarding N.I. Act offense
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Jayakumar vs Abdul Azeez regarding dishonored cheque
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Musthafa vs R. Muhammed Sha regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won