Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No: 1/2015

Case between Razikbabu vs Basheer Puthanveettil regarding N.I. Act offense

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju. V. G
Order Date
2015-02-11
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 02/11/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complainant Razikbabu filed a case under section 138 of N.I. Act, seeking withdrawal of the complaint which was granted, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complainant requested withdrawal of the complaint, which was granted resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Withdrawal of the complaint resulting in acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The complainant requested withdrawal of the complaint, which was granted resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Razikbabu
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o Pottengal Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basheer Puthanveettil
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K. A. Samad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Girish Pookayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Withdrawal of complaint/Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Complainant permitted to withdraw the complaint leading to the accused's acquittal
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Razikbabu vs Basheer Puthanveettil regarding N.I. Act offense
Case Code Year
Case between Razikbabu vs Basheer Puthanveettil regarding N.I. Act offense

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 02/11/2015 - 12:00
From
Sun, 02/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohammed Abdulrahiman vs Mohammed Abdulla Kavungal regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Senior Secondary MES Central School vs K.P. Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Jayakumar vs Abdul Azeez regarding dishonored cheque
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between P. Sameer vs N. Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Dhanya.M vs Abdul Gafoor regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-11
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won