| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 411 - 415 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr.Sajeev Peethambaran regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 121/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

approximately-3 years 7 months 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Hill Green regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 864 /2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-03

approximately-1 year 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Jithin Raj et al regarding Suit For Realization of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 657/2018

ERNAKULAM

2025-03-03

approximately-9 years 6 months 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Nima T G @ Nima Sumesh, Mini Antony regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 888/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-06

approximately-5 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aravind Kumar vs Saju M Y regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 394 /2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-10

approximately-3 years 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the necessary court fees (batta), resulting in automatic dismissal.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Judgments were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during crucial court hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Essential Steps

Dismissing cases where plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps to advance their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Essential Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?