Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.70/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Laiju.M.P regarding loan default

Court
COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Sidhik. K
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff against Mr. Laiju.M.P for the realization of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on a loan of Rs.10,00,000 taken from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, directing the defendant to pay Rs.10,90,588.74 to the plaintiff with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,90,588.74 and interest.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, directing the defendant to pay Rs.10,90,588.74 to the plaintiff with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged testimony and evidence showing the defendant's failure to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged testimony and evidence showing the defendant's failure to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 coupled with documents Exts. A1 to A9 very well shows that the defendant failed to repay the outstanding amount with interest to plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,90,588.74/- (Rupees ten lakh ninety thousand five hundred eighty eight and seventy four paise only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Laiju.M.P
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory Note, Hypothecation Agreement, Letter of undertaking, Letter of Continuity, Simple Agreement, Interest Agreement, Lawyers notice, Non starter report, True Extract of statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Usha. M.E
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Suma. P.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay the outstanding amount to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,90,588.74/-.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation of the decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation of the decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hypothecation agreement of goods and debts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant securing collateral for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Undertaking Not to Alienate Hypothecated Goods
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as part of the loan conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant reaffirming the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Simple Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the basic terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the interest rate applicable to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notified the defendant about the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Non starter report of District legal service authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the failed mediation attempt.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: True extract of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding dues of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Laiju.M.P regarding loan default
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Laiju.M.P regarding loan default

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 06/23/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Niyas et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA THIRUVAMBADI Branch vs BABU T JOSEPH regarding realisation of loan amount.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between BANK OF INDIA vs SMT. SUHAIRUNNISSA regarding realisation of amount from the defendants.
Commercial Court III
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs Mr. PRASOON RAJ.C regarding realisation of amount
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aleena Johney et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won