Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.164/2021

Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Kumudam Malayil et al regarding realisation of loan amount.

Court
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Sidhik. K
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-7 years 11 months 10 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount of Rs.7,65,667 from the defendants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased borrower, Ragesh M. The case revolves around a cash credit facility that was granted to Ragesh and the subsequent defaults in repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount along with interest. It was clarified that the defendants are liable only to the extent of the property inherited from the deceased Ragesh.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.7,65,667 along with interest.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount along with interest. It was clarified that the defendants are liable only to the extent of the property inherited from the deceased Ragesh.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants inherited movable and immovable properties from the deceased borrower.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants inherited movable and immovable properties from the deceased borrower.
Supporting Evidence
Ext.A2 sanction memorandum of credit facility shows that Mr. M Ragesh had availed a cash credit facility of Rs.10,00,000/- from plaintiff bank on 09.08.2015 and had further agreed to repay the principal amount with interest.

Judgment Evidence:

Accordingly all these issues are answered in favour of the plaintiff. The suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.7,65,667 to the plaintiff, with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the realization of the amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Kumudam Malayil
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Bini
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Letter of Proprietorship, Sanction Memorandum, Pronote, Request for overdraft facilities, Letter of undertaking re Loans/Advance, Overdraft Agreement, Copy of Lawyer's notice, Postal receipt, Statement of Account, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Acknowledgment of debt and security from the legal heirs of borrower/Co-obligant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.K. Madhusudhanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Viswambharan K.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.7,65,667/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.7,65,667/-...
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are liable to pay costs only if they have inherited any movable or immovable properties.
Evidence:
Defendants are liable to pay costs of the suit only if they have inherited any movable or immovable properties of deceased Mr. M Ragesh.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the assurances given by Mr. M Ragesh as sole proprietor to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the credit facility of Rs.10,00,000/- sanctioned to Mr. Ragesh.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A legal acknowledgment of the debt where Mr. Ragesh promised to pay Rs.10,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Request for overdraft facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document backing Mr. Ragesh's request for additional overdraft facilities.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Undertaking re Loans/Advance
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing Mr. Ragesh's agreement to terms for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Overdraft Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal binding agreement for overdraft availed by Mr. Ragesh.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demands repayment of the outstanding loan amount from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding amount due from Mr. Ragesh's account.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security from Legal Heirs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendants regarding their liability towards the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Kumudam Malayil et al regarding realisation of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Kumudam Malayil et al regarding realisation of loan amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 08/09/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Thanooja regarding realisation of amount
Commercial Court III Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Jagath K.M regarding realisation of money.
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal bank Ltd. vs MR. Jafer C. V regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vijas K.P et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sreeraj.P regarding realisation of amount from the defendant.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won