Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit. No. 75/2024

Case between The State Bank of India vs Athira Raveendran regarding realisation of an amount.

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India filed a suit against Athira Raveendran for recovery of a loan amount of ₹11,74,367/- along with interest. The defendant defaulted on the repayment of the sanctioned loan amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant, Athira Raveendran, must pay the State Bank of India the amount of ₹11,74,367/- along with specified interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹11,74,367/- to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant, Athira Raveendran, must pay the State Bank of India the amount of ₹11,74,367/- along with specified interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff successfully proved the defendant had availed the loan and defaulted on repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff successfully proved the defendant had availed the loan and defaulted on repayment.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the plaintiff has successfully proved that the defendant had availed loan from the plaintiff bank as stated in the plaint.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹11,74,367/- to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The State Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Athira Raveendran
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Letter of arrangement, Agreement of Loan-cum hypothecation, Copy of Lawyer notice, Acknowledgment card, True extract of the Account statement, True copy of the certificate showing the unapplied, but accrued interest in respect of the Cash Credit Limit.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of an amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of 11,74,367/- (Rupees eleven lakh seventy four thousand three hundred and sixty seven only) to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest on the recovered amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit (29-11-2024) till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation of the decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application executed by the defendant for availing the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The letter confirming the arrangement for the loan amount sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement of Loan-cum hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed by the defendant to repay the loan amount and interest.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice sent to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment received concerning the loan-related communications.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: True extract of the Account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement showing the transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate showing unapplied interest
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The certificate indicating the accumulated but unapplied interest.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of RBI Circular
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The RBI circular relevant to banking operations in this context.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of RBI Circular
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another RBI circular pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Interest Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement detailing the interest accrued on the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Copy of Non-starter Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The report indicating the non-starter status of certain bank accounts.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between The State Bank of India vs Athira Raveendran regarding realisation of an amount.
Case Code Year
Case between The State Bank of India vs Athira Raveendran regarding realisation of an amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 11/29/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Niyas et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA THIRUVAMBADI Branch vs BABU T JOSEPH regarding realisation of loan amount.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between BANK OF INDIA vs SMT. SUHAIRUNNISSA regarding realisation of amount from the defendants.
Commercial Court III
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs Mr. PRASOON RAJ.C regarding realisation of amount
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aleena Johney et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won