| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18371 - 18375 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhi Mohammed et al vs Safiya et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 262 OF 2015

2019-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parambattu Sulaiman vs Machingal Muhammed et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 337 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk

2019-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K.C.Muhammad @ Bava vs Kadavath Muhammad regarding exparte order restoration

Civil Suit

KLML130004202018

Malappuram

2019-03-02

0 years, 8 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kadavath Muhammad vs K.C.Muhammad @ Bava regarding restoration of petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1935/2018

Malappuram

2019-03-02

0 years, 5 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Cholakkalthadathi Moosu vs Pathumma et al regarding partition.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 234 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2019-03-02

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to their cases being dismissed for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required actions, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissals for inactivity.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Courts dismissed cases when plaintiffs were absent during hearings, indicating a lack of seriousness.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?