Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 234 OF 2015

Case between Cholakkalthadathi Moosu vs Pathumma et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Cholakkalthadathi Moosu filed a suit for partition against Pathumma and others. Both parties were absent and the suit was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for partition due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for partition due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Cholakkalthadathi Moosu
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathumma
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yachakutty
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayisumma
Party Age
46
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
43
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vipin Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Muhammed Rafeek.A.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cholakkalthadathi Moosu vs Pathumma et al regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Cholakkalthadathi Moosu vs Pathumma et al regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won