| Niyamam AI

Displaying 211 - 215 of 753

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP et al vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding recovery of possession and realization of amount

Commercial Suit

Commercial Suit. No. 20/2025

Kozhikode

2025-06-23

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Imbichipathu @ Bichathu vs Kacha et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.162/2023

Kozhikode

2025-09-15

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Baby Mol Varghese et al vs P.Radha regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 579/2020

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-5 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 354/2021

Kozhikode

2025-10-08

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gafoorkhan (Died), Shakeela Banu. A, Sherin Khan. G, Shameenbanu. G, Shamsheer Khan. G vs Noorjahan, Surayya, Sheeri, Shahanas, Roshanbi, Shaik Muhammad Haneef, Aneez, Muhammad Shamraz, Nishana regarding specific performance of contract.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 47/2024

Kozhikode

2025-10-24

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership or Rights

Plaintiffs often failed to provide clear evidence of ownership over the disputed property, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many suits were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear or represent their cases in court.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs frequently lacked adequate supporting documents or evidence to back their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Maintainability of Claims

Several cases were dismissed because they were deemed not maintainable based on legal technicalities or prior resolutions.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership or Rights

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Insufficient Evidence Submitted

Non-Maintainability of Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?