Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 579/2020

Case between Baby Mol Varghese et al vs P.Radha regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Baby Mol Varghese, represented by her Power of Attorney Holder Gheevar.K. Cheriyan, is the plaintiff seeking recovery of possession of a property against P.Radha, who claims to be residing there as a tenant. The case revolves around the ownership and right to possess the plaint schedule property based on a WILL.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to surrender possession of the plaint schedule property and pay costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to surrender possession of the plaint schedule property and pay costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established ownership over the plaint schedule property through a registered WILL and subsequent court judgments.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established ownership over the plaint schedule property through a registered WILL and subsequent court judgments.
Supporting Evidence
When the Honourable High Court has confirmed the title of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property, no further proof of the exhibit A1 WILL is required. The plaintiff has title over by the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is hereby direct to surrender vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Mol Varghese
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gheevar.K. Cheriyan
Party Age
55
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.Radha
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the Registered Will bearing no.14/1991, Certified copy of Judgment in RSA No.911/2008, Original Power of Attorney, Certified copy of Judgment in OS 766/2000, Certified copy of Order in RCP 129/2000, Certified copy of Counter in RCP 129/2000, Certified copy of Judgment in OS 581/2005, Copy of lawyer notice, Reply Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muhammed Iqubal K.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Noorjahan.C.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sidharthan.P.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree of recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows:- 1. The defendant is hereby direct to surrender vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within one month from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the proceedings to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the Registered Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's title over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Affirms the findings regarding the plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original power of attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Grants authority to the plaintiff's representative.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details previous rulings relevant to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Refers to prior proceedings related to the defendant's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Counter
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details arguments made by the defendant previously.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Pertains to a previous case involving the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's request for surrender of property.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Contains the defendant's response to the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of Possession
Case Code
Case between Baby Mol Varghese et al vs P.Radha regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Baby Mol Varghese et al vs P.Radha regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 09/29/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ahammed koya S.V. vs Bichu et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Thankamani vs Valappil Nadeera regarding recovery of possession
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won