Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 47/2024

Case between Gafoorkhan (Died), Shakeela Banu. A, Sherin Khan. G, Shameenbanu. G, Shamsheer Khan. G vs Noorjahan, Surayya, Sheeri, Shahanas, Roshanbi, Shaik Muhammad Haneef, Aneez, Muhammad Shamraz, Nishana regarding specific performance of contract.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including the heirs of Gafoorkhan, are seeking specific performance of a sale agreement with Ismail Khan, who is now deceased. The defendants, as legal heirs of Ismail Khan, have not complied with the agreement to register the sale deed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to execute and register a sale deed in favor of the plaintiffs within two months. If the defendants fail to comply, the plaintiffs may get the sale deed executed through the court at the defendants' expense.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to execute and register a sale deed in favour of plaintiffs with respect to plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to execute and register a sale deed in favor of the plaintiffs within two months. If the defendants fail to comply, the plaintiffs may get the sale deed executed through the court at the defendants' expense.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence provided by the plaintiffs remains unchallenged, establishing their continuous possession and the defendants' failure to comply with the contractual obligations.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence provided by the plaintiffs remains unchallenged, establishing their continuous possession and the defendants' failure to comply with the contractual obligations.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence put forth by the plaintiffs remains unchallenged. The plaintiff was always ready and willing to complete registration. Hence, the specific performance of the agreement should be ordered.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is decreed as follows: 1.Defendants are directed to execute and register a sale deed in favour of plaintiffs with respect to plaint schedule property within two month from the date of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gafoorkhan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shakeela Banu. A
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sherin Khan. G
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shameenbanu. G
Party Age
19
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shamsheer Khan. G
Party Age
16
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noorjahan
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surayya
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeri
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahanas
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshanbi
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement executed between plaintiff and Ismail Khan, Certified Copy of Deed No. 391/2004.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T. V. Pradeep Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K. P. Mayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sreeraj P. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to execute and register a sale deed in favor of plaintiffs with respect to plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed as follows: 1.Defendants are directed to execute and register a sale deed in favour of plaintiffs with respect to plaint schedule property within two month from the date of the decree.
Relief Type: Execution through Court
Outcome: Granted
Description:
On failure of defendants to register the sale deed, plaintiffs can approach the court for execution through court at the defendants' expense.
Evidence:
On the failure of defendants to do so, plaintiffs can approach this court for getting the sale deed executed through this court at the expenses of defendants.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court fee payable shall be recoverable by the state government from the plaintiff and will be a first charge on the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The court fee payable shall be recoverable by the state government from the plaintiff and same shall be a first charge on the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement executed between the plaintiff and Ismail Khan for the sale of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Deed
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document certifies the ownership of Ismail Khan in the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendants demanding registration of the sale deed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of sending notices to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an acknowledgment card confirming receipt of the notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Unserved notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document includes multiple unserved notices with acknowledgment cards, indicating the defendants did not receive them.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Specific performance of contract
Case Code
Case between Gafoorkhan (Died), Shakeela Banu. A, Sherin Khan. G, Shameenbanu. G, Shamsheer Khan. G vs Noorjahan, Surayya, Sheeri, Shahanas, Roshanbi, Shaik Muhammad Haneef, Aneez, Muhammad Shamraz, Nishana regarding specific performance of contract.
Case Code Year
Case between Gafoorkhan (Died), Shakeela Banu. A, Sherin Khan. G, Shameenbanu. G, Shamsheer Khan. G vs Noorjahan, Surayya, Sheeri, Shahanas, Roshanbi, Shaik Muhammad Haneef, Aneez, Muhammad Shamraz, Nishana regarding specific performance of contract.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 01/15/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sadasivan et al vs Valiyedath Subhadra et al regarding partition
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won