Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.162/2023

Case between Imbichipathu @ Bichathu vs Kacha et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Imbichipathu @ Bichathu seeks a declaration of her title over a property she has possessed since 1978, claiming adverse possession against the defendants Kacha and others. The defendants, however, contested the claim after demanding the plaintiff vacate the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, confirming her title over the property based on adverse possession. The defendants were restrained from evicting the plaintiff and ordered to pay costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, confirming her title over the property based on adverse possession. The defendants were restrained from evicting the plaintiff and ordered to pay costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved continuous possession and title over the property by adverse possession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved continuous possession and title over the property by adverse possession.
Supporting Evidence
The continuous possession for the requisite period of 12 years of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property is proved by the oral evidence of the PW1, the exhibit A1 to A27 documents produced before the court and the exhibit C1 series report and plan of the advocate commissioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has obtained right, title, and interest over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession and no other person has any right, title or interest over the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Imbichipathu @ Bichathu
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kacha
Party Age
85
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.Bachu
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suharabi
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainabi
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheeda
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Electricity consumer invoice, Demand/Disconnection notice issued from Electricity Board, Building Tax Receipts, Property Tax Receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Razal Rahiman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Jyothi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adin Dev.V.K
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree declaring ownership over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has obtained right, title, and interest over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession and no other person has any right, title or interest over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or forcefully evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Electricity consumer invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the plaintiff's possession and claims over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand/Disconnection notice issued from Electricity Board
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the plaintiff's ongoing utility connections and engagement with the authorities.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Electricity payment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's continuous occupancy and financial responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt issued by KSEB
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of long-term occupancy and accountability over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt issued by KSEB
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further establishes the plaintiff's engagement with the utility provider.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Notice received from Kozhikode Corporation Tax department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reinforces the plaintiff's possession and responsibility regarding property taxes.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipt received from Kozhikode Corporation department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the plaintiff's historical payments and claims to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Notice received from Kozhikode Corporation Tax department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acts as evidence of the plaintiff's legal engagement with tax authorities.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Notice received from Kozhikode Corporation Tax department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further confirms the plaintiff's ongoing dealings with local authorities regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Bill from Kozhikode Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented evidence of the plaintiff's regular financial commitments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Highlights the plaintiff's compliance with tax regulations supporting ownership claims.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides further substantiation to the plaintiff's claims of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reinforces ownership claims through proper documentation of tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Affirms the plaintiff's long-term financial commitment to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to support claims of ownership through evidence of tax compliance.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's ongoing obligations related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reinforces the plaintiff's claims of long-term and consistent ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the plaintiff's continuous occupancy over time.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further establishes the duration of possession claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presents additional evidence to support the plaintiff's ownership claims.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to validate the plaintiff's position regarding ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Receipt from Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acts as a proof of the plaintiff's legal engagement with property registration.
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Original RS By Registration slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim through documented registration history.
Reference:
Ext.A23
Document Type: Original Building Permit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes legal permission for construction indicating legitimate use of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A24
Document Type: Original Building Permit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reinforces the claims of legitimate construction and occupancy.
Reference:
Ext.A25
Document Type: Original Building Plan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further substantiates the claims of proper approval and legal occupancy.
Reference:
Ext.A27
Document Type: Commission Report by Advocate Commissioner
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Was crucial for proving the plaintiff's continuous possession.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch by Advocate Commissioner
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided physical representation of the property and its boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Adverse possession
Case Code
Case between Imbichipathu @ Bichathu vs Kacha et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Imbichipathu @ Bichathu vs Kacha et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sadasivan et al vs Valiyedath Subhadra et al regarding partition
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won