| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1061 - 1065 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammed Haji et al vs Kadavath Muhammed regarding settlement

Civil Suit - Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 33 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-11-17

Not mentioned

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammad Haji vs Kadavath Muhammad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 62 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-10-27

4 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Representation or Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to absence or lack of representation during hearings, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs or their counsel did not press the petition in court.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Improper Compliance with Legal Requirements

Several petitions were dismissed due to non-compliance with statutory requirements or improper valuation.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Representation or Absence

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Case

Improper Compliance with Legal Requirements

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?