Case Summary
Petitioner, represented by Erachampattu Haneefa, filed a petition under section 5 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, section 5 was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o Hamza Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampattu Haneefa
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o Hamza Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujatha Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o Sreenivasan
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P.Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.I.V.Rathish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not pressed
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Not a clear mention of the reason
Case Code
Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent