RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Court

Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K

Order Date

2018-11-02

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Fri, 11/02/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim filed a petition under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Final Judgment

The petition filed under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965 was dismissed as 'not pressed'.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner's counsel endorsed not press in the petition. Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o Hamza Haji

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Erachampattu Haneefa
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Hamza Haji

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.Sreenivasan
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o Gopalan

Plaintiffs Documents

Petition under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P.P.Basheer
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.I.V.Rathish
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.S Hariharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Petition dismissal as not pressed

Evidence: