Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K
Order Date
2018-11-02
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim filed a petition under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965 was dismissed as 'not pressed'.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner's counsel endorsed not press in the petition. Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim (46 years) Erachampattu House, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk Erachampattu Haneefa (44 years) Erachampattu House, Tirur amsom desom, .O.Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk PIN 676 107

Defendants

M.Sreenivasan (58 years) Machalil House, Thalakkad amsom Mangattiri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk PIN 676 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition dismissal as not pressed
Evidence:
Petitioner's counsel endorsed not press in the petition. Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases