| Niyamam AI

Displaying 906 - 910 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty et al vs M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau et al regarding Rent Control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 117/2022

Ernakulam

2024-08-30

approximately-2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.S. Dinachandran et al vs The premier Cable Company Ltd. regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 94/1995

Ernakulam

2024-07-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Asha Mary Thomas vs K.C Naseema regarding possession of a building.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 30/2020

Ernakulam

2024-07-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh Ninan vs Bijoy Thomas regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 47/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-27

approximately-4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Sattanathan vs K.K. Mohanan regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 107/2019

Ernakulam

2024-07-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to attend hearings, resulting in dismissals for default or absence of representation.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs' counsel decided not to press the petition for various reasons.

Found in 29 cases (29%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Legal Standing

Plaintiffs often could not establish rights related to the landlord-tenant relationship, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction or Proper Grounds

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction or legal grounds for eviction or other claims.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Failure to Prove Legal Standing

Lack of Jurisdiction or Proper Grounds

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?