Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 30/2020

Case between Asha Mary Thomas vs K.C Naseema regarding possession of a building.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asha Mary Thomas is the petitioner seeking possession of a building from the respondent K.C Naseema. The court ordered the respondent to give the petitioner vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for vacant possession of the building, ordering the respondent to hand over possession to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for vacant possession of the building, ordering the respondent to hand over possession to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asha Mary Thomas
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.C Naseema
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Reghukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vandana Jayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Ramaswamy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabeela C.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jisha Sasi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asha Mary Thomas vs K.C Naseema regarding possession of a building.
Case Code Year
Case between Asha Mary Thomas vs K.C Naseema regarding possession of a building.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Elizabeth George vs Mr. Somarajan P.K. regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won