Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 30/2020

Case between Asha Mary Thomas vs K.C Naseema regarding possession of a building.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asha Mary Thomas is the petitioner seeking possession of a building from the respondent K.C Naseema. The court ordered the respondent to give the petitioner vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for vacant possession of the building, ordering the respondent to hand over possession to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asha Mary Thomas (61 years years) Neelampilalil House, House No. 48, Vijaya Road, Ayani Nada, Maradu P.O., Kundannur, Ernakulam-682 304

Defendants

K.C Naseema (57 years years) Surag, Peralassery Bhagam, Mundalloor Kara, Mundalloor P.O., Mundalloor Village, Kannur Thahsil, Kannur District-670 622

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases