R.C.P. No. 94/1995

Case between K.S. Dinachandran et al vs The premier Cable Company Ltd. regarding Rent Control

Court

THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-07-18

Duration

Case Closed

Thu, 07/18/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.S. Dinachandran and K.S. Jayakumar filed a rent control petition against The premier Cable Company Ltd. The case was dismissed due to lack of representation from the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition for default due to non-representation by the petitioners.

Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of interest from the petitioners.

Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of interest from the petitioners.

Supporting Evidence

the view that petitioner is not interested to prosecute further with the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.S. Dinachandran
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.S. Jayakumar
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: The premier Cable Company Ltd.

Plaintiffs Documents

Nil

Defendants Documents

Nil

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Babu Karukapadath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: A.P. Krishnankutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: C.N. Ramachandran Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Evidence: