| Niyamam AI

Displaying 356 - 360 of 596

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thomas V.A vs Libu Joseph regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST-149/2019

Vaikom Taluk

2025-04-03

approximately-5 years 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Kottayam District General Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd et al vs Manonmani K N regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST-87/2020

Vaikom

2025-02-15

approximately-4 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Joseph Thomas vs Luckachen M J regarding settlement of a complaint.

Criminal Case

ST No.09/2023

PALA

2025-11-29

approximately-7 years 9 months 13 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ninny Sebastian vs Benny Ignatious regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

ST No.04/2021

Pala

2025-11-29

approximately-6 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Balakrishnan Nair vs Aneesh Joseph regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

ST No.33/2019

Pala

2025-12-05

approximately-6 years 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

344

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

Plaintiffs frequently withdrew their complaints, resulting in the acquittal of defendants in multiple cases.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Issuance of Cheque

Plaintiffs failed to establish that the accused issued the cheque, leading to acquittals based on insufficient evidence.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

Many cases resulted in acquittals due to the complainant's consistent failure to appear or offer evidence.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Legally Enforceable Liability

Acquittals occurred where the complainant could not demonstrate the accused had a legal liability for the cheque.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

Failure to Prove Issuance of Cheque

Complainant's Absence in Court

Lack of Legally Enforceable Liability

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?