Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No.09/2023

Case between Joseph Thomas vs Luckachen M J regarding settlement of a complaint.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Judge
Sri.Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-7 years 9 months 13 days
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph Thomas filed a complaint against Luckachen M J under the N.I. Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was withdrawn.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn after a settlement. The accused was acquitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn after a settlement. The accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant submitted that the matter is settled.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Complainant submits that matter is settled.

Judgment Evidence:

Allowed. Complainant is dismissed as withdrawn. Accused is acquitted under section 257 of Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Thomas
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Luckachen M J
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Mathew Mathai Muthukadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Biju Zacharia Kolady
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Lal P K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Complainant is dismissed as withdrawn
Evidence:
Complainant submits that matter is settled. A withdrawal petition is also filed as CMP No.273/25. Heard. Allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under section 257 of Cr.PC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph Thomas vs Luckachen M J regarding settlement of a complaint.
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph Thomas vs Luckachen M J regarding settlement of a complaint.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
PALA
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Fri, 02/16/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Pala
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Global Agencies vs Jose Antony regarding Withdrawal of Complaint
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Joby Jose vs Anju Prakash regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won