Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T No. 6 /2020

Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II
Judge
Smt. Kavya S.S
Order Date
2025-03-05
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 03/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ragul K.R. is the complainant who filed a case against Santha Suresh and V.K. Sureshkumar for an offence under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant has been continuously absent, leading to the court's decision to acquit the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acquitted the accused due to the continuous absence of the complainant. The complainant showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the continuous absence of the complainant. The complainant showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant.
Why Defendant Won:
The complaint was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant.
Supporting Evidence
It appears that the complainant has no interest in prosecuting the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, this court has no way other than to invoke Sec. 256 Cr.P.C. Hence, accused No.1 and 2 are acquitted u/s 256 Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ragul K.R.
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha Suresh
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.K. Sureshkumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.S Sarathkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abijith S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused No.1 and 2 are acquitted
Evidence:
Hence, this court has no way other than to invoke Sec. 256 Cr.P.C. Hence, accused No.1 and 2 are acquitted u/s 256 Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Mon, 11/23/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Pala
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasia V.V vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Balakrishnan vs Salim Thayyil regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Joby Jose vs Anju Prakash regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won