Case Summary
Devasia V.V is the complainant against Justy Toms for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was absent, and the complainant was also not represented during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The charge against the accused stands abated due to the death of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the charge against the accused stands abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devasia V.V
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Justy Toms
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Death certificate produced.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Jaisemon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Sanju K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Charge against the accused stands abated due to death.
Evidence:
Hence, the charge against the accused stands abated.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Death Certificate
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The death certificate was produced as evidence to support the claim that the accused is no more.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Devasia V.V vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Devasia V.V vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act