Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No.05/2019

Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.

Court
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Pala
Judge
Sri. Hasheem. S
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-8 years 12 days
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant Midhun Scaria filed a complaint against George Joseph alleging violation of the Negotiable Instruments Act after a cheque issued by the accused was dishonoured. The dispute arose over a loan of ₹6,00,000 taken by the accused from the complainant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused George Joseph was found guilty of issuing a dishonoured cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹6,00,000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of ₹6,00,000.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused George Joseph was found guilty of issuing a dishonoured cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹6,00,000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant proved that the accused dishonoured the cheque and did not rebut the presumption under sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The accused issued Ext.P1 cheque to the complainant for discharging a legally enforceable debt of ₹6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only). The defence could not raise a probable defence to rebut the presumption drawn in favour of the complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is found guilty of the offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He is convicted u/s 255(2) of the Cr. P.C for the said offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to impose the following sentence.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Midhun Scaria
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Joseph
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.320525, Cheque return memo dated 21.09.2017, Office copy of legal notice dated 09.10.2017, Postal receipt dated 09.10.2017, Postal acknowledgment card dated 11.10.2017
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas V T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year, and to pay a fine of ₹6,00,000 with interest.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year, and to pay a fine of ₹6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakh Only) with interest @6% per annum from the date of the judgment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The accused issued Ext.P1 cheque to the complainant for discharging a legally enforceable debt of ₹6,00,000.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Cheque return memo dated 21.09.2017 issued from the Canara Bank, Pala branch for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the legal notice issued to the accused demanding repayment of the cheque amount.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt dated 09.10.2017 for sending the statutory notice.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgement card showing that the accused received the notice on 11.10.2017.
Reference:
Ext.P5

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.
Case Code Year
Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
1 year

Quick Facts

Location
Pala, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Thu, 10/26/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Devasia V.V vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Balakrishnan vs Salim Thayyil regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Joby Jose vs Anju Prakash regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won