Case Summary
Thomas V.A is the complainant, and Libu Joseph is the accused in this case concerning an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The entire amount was paid, and the case was allowed to be withdrawn.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted as the complainant's withdrawal petition was allowed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Allowed. Accused acquitted U/s.257 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas V.A
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Libu Joseph
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Subhash Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.B Surjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Withdrawal petition filed
Evidence:
Withdrawal petition filed. Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted
Evidence:
Accused acquitted U/s.257 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Thomas V.A vs Libu Joseph regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Thomas V.A vs Libu Joseph regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act