Case Summary
Ninny Sebastian filed a complaint against Benny Ignatious under the N.I. Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn, and the accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was settled and subsequently withdrawn.
The complaint was settled and subsequently withdrawn.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard. Allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ninny Sebastian
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Benny Ignatious
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.K Ravikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.P K Jaisemon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.
Evidence:
Heard. Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.PC.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ninny Sebastian vs Benny Ignatious regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Ninny Sebastian vs Benny Ignatious regarding U/s.138 of N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act