Case Summary
Vivek Iyer filed a petition against Anish Bal regarding non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with a previous order and remained absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court stopped all proceedings and directed the respondent to vacate the premises since they did not comply with the rent order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not provide any sufficient cause for the default.
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not provide any sufficient cause for the default.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not provide any sufficient cause for the default.
The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not provide any sufficient cause for the default.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2023 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vivek Iyer
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anish Bal
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nithin George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vizzy George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. Deepak
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S. Unnikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Maria Jose
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ardra Krishnan M.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.B. Priyakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vivek Iyer vs Anish Bal regarding rent control compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Vivek Iyer vs Anish Bal regarding rent control compliance