Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 356/2023

Case between Vijayakrishnan Nair @ Babu vs John regarding temporary injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 day
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Vijayakrishnan Nair, who is seeking a temporary injunction against John to prevent obstruction in accessing a pathway and completing boundary fencing. The petitioner claims that the respondent has repeatedly attempted to block access to the pathway and has caused damage to the fencing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially allowed the petition, restraining the respondent from causing further obstruction in the pathway. The petitioner is entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the respondent from obstructing the pathway
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially allowed the petition, restraining the respondent from causing further obstruction in the pathway. The petitioner is entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The prima facie case and balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part. The respondent is hereby restrained from causing any obstruction in counter claim D schedule pathway until disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayakrishnan Nair @ Babu
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint submitted before the SHO, Anchalumoodu, Photographs 6 Nos
Defendants Documents
Land tax receipt, Copy of settlement deed No. 3031/2019, Copy of field map No. 348 of Panayam Village.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sankarapillai. P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arunkumar. K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from causing any obstruction in the D schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The respondent/counterclaim defendant is hereby restrained from causing any obstruction in counter claim D schedule pathway until disposal of the suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realise costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint submitted before the SHO regarding obstruction in the D schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs related to the D schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land tax receipt indicating ownership and property details.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of settlement deed relevant to the property dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Field Map
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Field map indicating the layout and boundaries of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report detailing findings on the property and pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayakrishnan Nair @ Babu vs John regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakrishnan Nair @ Babu vs John regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/17/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won