Case Summary
Restoration petition allowed on condition to pay costs to respondents by a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was allowed on the condition to pay costs to the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs. 4000/- to respondents on or before 18-3-14 vide order in separate sheet.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Venugopalan Nair
- Relation
- Died-P1
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bhargavi Amma
- Relation
- P2
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Velayudhan
- Relation
- R1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhaskaran
- Relation
- R2
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate (for Velayudhan-R1), Advocate (for 2)
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition was granted.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs. 4000/- to respondents on or before 18-3-14 vide order in separate sheet.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Venugopalan Nair et al vs Velayudhan et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Venugopalan Nair et al vs Velayudhan et al regarding restoration petition