Case Summary
Petitioner Etteth Raman filed a restoration petition against respondents seeking relief, but the petition was dismissed for non-payment of costs on the specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking restoration was dismissed as the petitioner failed to pay the cost to the respondent within the stipulated time.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Unknown
Judgment Evidence:
On 10-07-2015 cost not paid. Petition stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Etteth Raman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naduvila Valappil Surendran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ishak
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Unknown
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Etteth Raman vs Naduvila Valappil Surendran et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Etteth Raman vs Naduvila Valappil Surendran et al regarding restoration petition