Case Summary
Petitioner filed a restoration petition seeking to restore a case due to non-appearance of the plaintiff or Power of Attorney Holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the case
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition stands allowed on the condition of payment of costs to each respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No explanation has been offered for non appearance of plaintiff or Power of Attorney Holder. Hence the contention is only for dragging the matter.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiyanaalakath Mustafa
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Ayoob
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.A.Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Ayoob
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the case
Evidence:
The petition stands allowed on the condition of payment of costs to each respondent.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanaalakath Mustafa vs Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Ayoob regarding non-appearance
Case Code Year
Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanaalakath Mustafa vs Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Ayoob regarding non-appearance