Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 142 OF 2016

Case between Velayudhan vs Edathottil Narayanan's children regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-02-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for injunction filed by Velayudhan against the children of Edathottil Narayanan. The plaintiff was absent, and the court noted that another suit related to the same agreement was pending.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and noted the existence of another pending suit on the same agreement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and noted the existence of another pending suit on the same agreement.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence not proceeding with this suit. Recorded. And suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Velayudhan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulojana
Party Age
62
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savithri
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathi Devi
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramani
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hemalatha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manojkumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Bhavesh.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for Injunction was filed but the plaintiff was absent, and the case was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence not proceeding with this suit. Recorded. And suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Velayudhan vs Edathottil Narayanan's children regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Velayudhan vs Edathottil Narayanan's children regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 02/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/28/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won