Case Summary
The case involves a suit for injunction filed by Vadakkepeediyekkal Muhammed against Puthukayil Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Kadar. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's absence led to the court dismissing the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadakkepeediyekkal Muhammed @ Bava
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Puthukayil Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Kadar
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vadakkepeediyekkal Muhammed @ Bava vs Puthukayil Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Kadar regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Vadakkepeediyekkal Muhammed @ Bava vs Puthukayil Puthiya Maliyekkal Abdul Kadar regarding injunction.