Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 426/2019

Case between V. L. Anoop vs Sasidharan Pillai, Raveendran Pillai regarding permanent injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, V. L. Anoop, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, Sasidharan Pillai and Raveendran Pillai. The case was settled in mediation, and the terms of the mediation were accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. The terms and conditions of the mediation report were accepted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. The terms and conditions of the mediation report were accepted by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
It’s terms and conditions are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement and the memorandum of the agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. L. Anoop
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasidharan Pillai
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raveendran Pillai
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saritha. R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Umayanaloor K. Retnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement and the memorandum of the agreement shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. L. Anoop vs Sasidharan Pillai, Raveendran Pillai regarding permanent injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between V. L. Anoop vs Sasidharan Pillai, Raveendran Pillai regarding permanent injunction.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 11/13/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won