Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 30 OF 2012

Case between Usmankutty vs Moideenkunhu @ Mullakoya regarding fixation of fair rent.

Court
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K .
Order Date
2019-03-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Usmankutty, filed a petition against Moideenkunhu @ Mullakoya for fixation of fair rent for a schedule room used for hotel business. The petitioner claimed rent arrears and requested an increase from Rs. 900 to Rs. 6000 per month due to the commercial importance of the area, while the respondent denied any tenant-landlord relationship.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court fixed the fair rent for the petition schedule room at Rs. 2000 per month from 23.07.2012 and allowed the petitioner to recover the entire cost of the proceedings from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fair rent fixed at Rs. 2000 per month with an increase of 5% every year.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the commercial importance of the area and the inadequacy of the current rent compared to local rates.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition stands allowed as follows: (1) Fair rent of the petition schedule room is fixed at Rs.2000/- per month from 23.07.2012 with an increase at the rate of 5% in the fair rent every year.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Usmankutty (54 Years years) Pattath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Moideenkunhu @ Mullakoya (50 Years years) Kalarikkal House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom, Near Vakkad Madrassa, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The petitioner sought to evict the respondent claiming entitlement to the property.
Evidence:
The petitioner is in need of the petition schedule room bonafidely for his own purpose.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fixation of fair rent for the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
I hold a view that the petitioner is entitled to get the rent at the rate of 2000/- per month.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to recover the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Hence the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the entire proceedings from the respondent or from his estate.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner issued this notice to demand rent payment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the petitioner's claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant for establishing history of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the rights of the parties over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues evidence of property transfer.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the chain of title leading to the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The primary document demonstrating the petitioner's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates payment of taxes as an indication of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A9(a)
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of payments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A9(b)
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to demonstrate tax responsibility.
Reference:
Ext.A9(c)
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to provide evidence of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A9(d)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates ongoing property tax obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A10(a)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A10(b)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to evidence tax responsibilities.
Reference:
Ext.A10(c)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Continues to demonstrate property tax obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A10(d)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the financial obligations associated with the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10(e)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of ongoing tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A10(f)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of the petitioner's active use and claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certified Copy of Abstract of Building Tax Assessment Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows long-term tax assessments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certified Copy of Letter from Secretary, Vettam Grama Panchayath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official communication demonstrating the petitioner's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certified Copy of Certificate issued by Secretary, Vettam Grama Panchayath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further corroboration of the petitioner's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certified copy of PATTA
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to land ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certified copy of PATTA
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of land ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Detailed cost for the existing shop building and Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides information about property value.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Certified copy of Order in RCP31/2012
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to past proceedings relevant to this case.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Cash Receipt, Vettom Grama Panchayath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of tax payment.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Internet Payment Receipt, Vettom Grama Panchayath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of tax responsibility.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Copy of Norms of PWD for the calculation of Rent
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Guidance on rental evaluation.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Certified copy of the deposition of RW1 in RCP31/2012
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Respondent's prior testimony in a related matter.
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence supporting the respondent's claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified copy of the deposition of PW1 in RCP31/2012
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Related testimony from a previous hearing.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence related to occupancy and use of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3(a)
Document Type: Certified Copy of Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence regarding the property usage.
Reference:
Ext.B3(b)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court's official examination of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases