Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 14/2025

Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves UNION BANK OF INDIA seeking to attach the movables of PREETHA MOHAN due to her failure to repay a loan of ₹ 5,58,740.85. The bank alleges that she is attempting to dissolve her business and migrate abroad, hence the petition for security.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition seeking attachment of movables based on the lack of evidence regarding the existence of the items mentioned in the attachment schedule. The court found no merit in the petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition seeking attachment of movables based on the lack of evidence regarding the existence of the items mentioned in the attachment schedule. The court found no merit in the petition.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to insufficient evidence regarding the existence of the requested items for attachment.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to insufficient evidence regarding the existence of the requested items for attachment.
Supporting Evidence
The commission report prepared makes no mention of any of the items mentioned in the attachment schedule.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
PREETHA MOHAN
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nidhi Sam John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jijo Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Celia Santhosh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renjith R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought for attachment of movables.
Evidence:
In view of these facts, I am of the opinion that this petition cannot be positively entertained at present.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables
Case Code Year
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Leona Bags et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won