Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 727/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

State Bank of India is suing Eldhose Varghese for failing to repay a personal loan of Rs. 4,50,000. Despite notification, the defendant did not respond or make payments on the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 4,88,652 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 4,88,652/- with 9% interest per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 4,88,652 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfy the claims of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfy the claims of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 4,88,652/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Eighty-Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty-Two Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Eldhose Varghese
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
The original of the loan application, the original of the arrangement letter, the original of the personal loan agreement, office copy of the demand notice, office copy of the lawyer notice, extract of the loan account maintained by the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith S Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Remil Regi George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 4,88,652 with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 4,88,652/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Eighty-Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty-Two Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to recover the decree amount from the defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
In default, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled for the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the arrangement letter issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the personal loan agreement executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the demand notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan Account Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Extract of the loan account of the defendant maintained by the plaintiff, duly certified.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/20/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Leona Bags et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won