Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No.1011/2022

Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff against Pushpavally P.G and Radhakrishnan B.C as defendants. The court ruled due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the balance court fee. The plaintiff had previously failed to uphold the suit due to similar reasons.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Vankarath Towers, Bye-pass Junction, Palarivattom, Cochin -24.

Defendants

Pushpavally P.G (61 years years) Sai Bhavan, V.K Krishna Menon Road, Udayamperoor P.O, Ernakulam - 682 307. Mr. Radhakrishnan B.C (64 years years) Sai Bhavan, V.K Krishna Menon Road, Udayamperoor P.O, Ernakulam - 682 307.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite multiple chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit was once rejected and restored for non payment of Court Fee. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/28/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases