Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff against Pushpavally P.G and Radhakrishnan B.C as defendants. The court ruled due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the balance court fee. The plaintiff had previously failed to uphold the suit due to similar reasons.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pushpavally P.G
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Radhakrishnan B.C
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mumtaz Shumsuddin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith M. Jiji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alisha Aslam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amina Ruby Faizal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tony Pettah
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite multiple chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit was once rejected and restored for non payment of Court Fee. Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.