Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 171/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Mohammed Ashique T K for recovery of outstanding loan amount. The defendant defaulted on a loan of Rs. 8,00,000 sanctioned under the Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount along with interest. The defendant's assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.9,54,655/- along with interest @12.30% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount along with interest. The defendant's assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case for recovery based on the defendant's agreement to repay the loan amount along with the stipulated interest.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case for recovery based on the defendant's agreement to repay the loan amount along with the stipulated interest.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.9,54,655/- with interest from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.9,54,655/- (Rupees Nine lakhs fifty four thousand six hundred and fifty five only) along with interest @12.30% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager Vijith N, S/o P P Narayanan Kutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Ashique T K
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o Mohammedkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan application form Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana dated 13.12.2022, Original agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 12.12.2022, Original letter of undertaking dated 13.12.2022, Original sanction letter dated 13.12.2022, True copy of lawyer notice dated 19.06.2024, Original postal receipt, True copy of accounts statement dated 10.02.2025
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
o V Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C P B Subramanian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rema Menon R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of outstanding amount of Rs.9,54,655/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.9,54,655/- (Rupees Nine lakhs fifty four thousand six hundred and fifty five only) along with interest @12.30% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan application form Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application signed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement signed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original letter signed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sanction letter signed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant regarding overdue payments.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipt related to the lawyer notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Accounts statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the computer-generated statement of accounts attested by the Manager of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Pushpavally P.G et al regarding a suit for recovery of court fees.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Leona Bags et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won